Bernie Sanders / Vatican Speech

This is the full transcript. It is, indeed, a copy and paste.

I am honored to be with you today and was pleased to receive your invitation to speak to this conference of The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. Today we celebrate the encyclical Centesimus Annus and reflect on its meaning for our world a quarter-century after it was presented by Pope John Paul II. With the fall of Communism, Pope John Paul II gave a clarion call for human freedom in its truest sense: freedom that defends the dignity of every person and that is always oriented towards the common good.

The Church’s social teachings, stretching back to the first modern encyclical about the industrial economy, Rerum Novarum in 1891, to Centesimus Annus, to Pope Francis’s inspiring encyclical Laudato Si’ this past year, have grappled with the challenges of the market economy. There are few places in modern thought that rival the depth and insight of the Church’s moral teachings on the market economy.

Over a century ago, Pope Leo XIII highlighted economic issues and challenges in Rerum Novarum that continue to haunt us today, such as what he called “the enormous wealth of a few as opposed to the poverty of the many.”

And let us be clear. That situation is worse today. In the year 2016, the top one percent of the people on this planet own more wealth than the bottom 99 percent, while the wealthiest 60 people – 60 people – own more than the bottom half – 3 1/2 billion people. At a time when so few have so much, and so many have so little, we must reject the foundations of this contemporary economy as immoral and unsustainable.

The words of Centesimus Annus likewise resonate with us today. One striking example:

Furthermore, society and the State must ensure wage levels adequate for the maintenance of the worker and his family, including a certain amount for savings. This requires a continuous effort to improve workers’ training and capability so that their work will be more skilled and productive, as well as careful controls and adequate legislative measures to block shameful forms of exploitation, especially to the disadvantage of the most vulnerable workers, of immigrants and of those on the margins of society. The role of trade unions in negotiating minimum salaries and working conditions is decisive in this area. (Para15)

The essential wisdom of Centesimus Annus is this: A market economy is beneficial for productivity and economic freedom. But if we let the quest for profits dominate society; if workers become disposable cogs of the financial system; if vast inequalities of power and wealth lead to marginalization of the poor and the powerless; then the common good is squandered and the market economy fails us. Pope John Paul II puts it this way: profit that is the result of “illicit exploitation, speculation, or the breaking of solidarity among working people . . . has not justification, and represents an abuse in the sight of God and man.” (Para43).

We are now twenty-five years after the fall of Communist rule in Eastern Europe. Yet we have to acknowledge that Pope John Paul’s warnings about the excesses of untrammeled finance were deeply prescient. Twenty-five years after Centesimus Annus, speculation, illicit financial flows, environmental destruction, and the weakening of the rights of workers is far more severe than it was a quarter century ago. Financial excesses, indeed widespread financial criminality on Wall Street, played a direct role in causing the world’s worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

We need a political analysis as well as a moral and anthropological analysis to understand what has happened since 1991. We can say that with unregulated globalization, a world market economy built on speculative finance burst through the legal, political, and moral constraints that had once served to protect the common good. In my country, home of the world’s largest financial markets, globalization was used as a pretext to deregulate the banks, ending decades of legal protections for working people and small businesses. Politicians joined hands with the leading bankers to allow the banks to become “too big to fail.” The result: eight years ago the American economy and much of the world was plunged into the worst economic decline since the 1930s. Working people lost their jobs, their homes and their savings, while the government bailed out the banks.

Inexplicably, the United States political system doubled down on this reckless financial deregulation, when the U.S. Supreme Court in a series of deeply misguided decisions, unleashed an unprecedented flow of money into American politics. These decisions culminated in the infamous Citizen United case, which opened the financial spigots for huge campaign donations by billionaires and large corporations to turn the U.S. political system to their narrow and greedy advantage. It has established a system in which billionaires can buy elections. Rather than an economy aimed at the common good, we have been left with an economy operated for the top 1 percent, who get richer and richer as the working class, the young and the poor fall further and further behind. And the billionaires and banks have reaped the returns of their campaign investments, in the form of special tax privileges, imbalanced trade agreements that favor investors over workers, and that even give multinational companies extra-judicial power over governments that are trying to regulate them.

But as both Pope John Paul II and Pope Francis have warned us and the world, the consequences have been even direr than the disastrous effects of financial bubbles and falling living standards of working-class families. Our very soul as a nation has suffered as the public lost faith in political and social institutions. As Pope Francis has stated: “Man is not in charge today, money is in charge, money rules.” And the Pope has also stated: “We have created new idols. The worship of the golden calf of old has found a new and heartless image in the cult of money and the dictatorship of an economy which is faceless and lacking any truly humane goal.”

And further: “While the income of a minority is increasing exponentially, that of the majority is crumbling. This imbalance results from ideologies which uphold the absolute autonomy of markets and financial speculation, and thus deny the right of control to States, which are themselves charged with providing for the common good.”

Pope Francis has called on the world to say: “No to a financial system that rules rather than serves” in Evangeli Gaudium. And he called upon financial executives and political leaders to pursue financial reform that is informed by ethical considerations. He stated plainly and powerfully that the role of wealth and resources in a moral economy must be that of servant, not master.

The widening gaps between the rich and poor, the desperation of the marginalized, the power of corporations over politics, is not a phenomenon of the United States alone. The excesses of the unregulated global economy have caused even more damage in the developing countries. They suffer not only from the boom-bust cycles on Wall Street, but from a world economy that puts profits over pollution, oil companies over climate safety, and arms trade over peace. And as an increasing share of new wealth and income goes to a small fraction of those at the top, fixing this gross inequality has become a central challenge. The issue of wealth and income inequality is the great economic issue of our time, the great political issue of our time, and the great moral issue of our time. It is an issue that we must confront in my nation and across the world.

Pope Francis has given the most powerful name to the predicament of modern society: the Globalization of Indifference. “Almost without being aware of it,” he noted, “we end up being incapable of feeling compassion at the outcry of the poor, weeping for other people’s pain, and feeling a need to help them, as though all this were someone else’s responsibility and not our own.” We have seen on Wall Street that financial fraud became not only the norm but in many ways the new business model. Top bankers have shown no shame for their bad behavior and have made no apologies to the public. The billions and billions of dollars of fines they have paid for financial fraud are just another cost of doing business, another short cut to unjust profits.

Some might feel that it is hopeless to fight the economic juggernaut, that once the market economy escaped the boundaries of morality it would be impossible to bring the economy back under the dictates of morality and the common good. I am told time and time again by the rich and powerful, and the mainstream media that represent them, that we should be “practical,” that we should accept the status quo; that a truly moral economy is beyond our reach. Yet Pope Francis himself is surely the world’s greatest demonstration against such a surrender to despair and cynicism. He has opened the eyes of the world once again to the claims of mercy, justice and the possibilities of a better world. He is inspiring the world to find a new global consensus for our common home.

I see that hope and sense of possibility every day among America’s young people. Our youth are no longer satisfied with corrupt and broken politics and an economy of stark inequality and injustice. They are not satisfied with the destruction of our environment by a fossil fuel industry whose greed has put short term profits ahead of climate change and the future of our planet. They want to live in harmony with nature, not destroy it. They are calling out for a return to fairness; for an economy that defends the common good by ensuring that every person, rich or poor, has access to quality health care, nutrition and education.

As Pope Francis made powerfully clear last year in Laudato Si’, we have the technology and know-how to solve our problems – from poverty to climate change to health care to protection of biodiversity. We also have the vast wealth to do so, especially if the rich pay their way in fair taxes rather than hiding their funds in the world’s tax and secrecy havens- as the Panama Papers have shown.

The challenges facing our planet are not mainly technological or even financial, because as a world we are rich enough to increase our investments in skills, infrastructure, and technological know-how to meet our needs and to protect the planet. Our challenge is mostly a moral one, to redirect our efforts and vision to the common good. Centesimus Annus, which we celebrate and reflect on today, and Laudato Si’, are powerful, eloquent and hopeful messages of this possibility. It is up to us to learn from them, and to move boldly toward the common good in our time.

Video can be found here.

 

Mexicans Should Reject Trump’s Populism at Home

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” he declared in June. “They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”Donald Trump, June, 2016.

This statement was not made during a casual conversation between friends or in a small business gathering. These words weren’t uttered by an American farmer who lives near the Mexican border or by the representative of a radical anti-immigration group.

They were made by a “serious” candidate to the presidency of the United States of America, the world’s most powerful country.

When Trump announced his candidacy last year, the reactions were varied. But the common denominator was that no one took it seriously.

Supposedly, Trump was just a businessman with somewhat of a rock star status. His candidacy would add a little flavor and humorous anecdotes to the presidential race, nothing more.

Trump’s candidacy is inevitable

Today, in March 2016, it is inevitable to have Trump as the official Republican Party candidate. Trump has swept the primaries and already has over 700 of the 1237 delegates needed to become the official Republican candidate, distantly followed by Ted Cruz and John Kasich.

Image Source: Pixabay.com

He already swept aside seemingly strong contenders like Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and Rand Paul.

In Mexico, things had been taken calmly and with political correctness. Entrepreneurs, opinion leaders, and politicians in general were not even half as radical as Trump when answering his insults and disqualifications.

Fear? Lack of empathy? Disbelief? Maybe a little bit of everything.

Recently, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, preceded by former presidents Felipe Calderón and Vicente Fox, finally made a public statement regarding Trump.

He said that “whoever speaks ill of Mexicans clearly does not know Mexicans.” Although this statement was necessary, it came somewhat belatedly.

The Real Dangers of Trumpism

It’s finally time to respond to Trump. Sharing videos on social media and calling him “crazy, fascistic, or ignorant” is no longer enough.

What seemed like a bad joke has become a real danger today. When a man who could lead the world’s most powerful country — and Mexico’s largest trading partner— unscrupulously accuses us of being rapists, thieves, murderers, and drug traffickers, we are all at risk.

This is so for three reasons:

  1. Those Mexicans currently residing in the United States, especially those without immigration papers, will become easy targets for abuse and personal attacks.
  2. Mexico’s relationship with the United States can be seriously affected. While there have been some ups and downs, in modern times Mexico’s relations with our northern neighbor have always been generally cordial and collaborative. 80% of Mexican exports go to the United States and 50% of our imports come from American producers.
  3. Mexico’s international image can be severely affected, with negative consequences for foreign investment, remittances, and tourism.

The Trump scandal gained new impetus with his proposal to build a wall across the border. The candidate said that not only would he build a thousand mile-long, US$8 billion wall, but also that Mexico would pay for it.

In a recent interview with Bob Woodward for NBC, he even hinted he would be willing to declare war against the Mexican government if it is not willing to cooperate with his “ambitious” project.

The Rise of Trumpism

Trump’s success in the primaries seems hard to explain to many, but I attribute it to the following factors:

Populism: Trump does not give American citizens lessons in morality or economics. He talks about what people want to talk about and promises solutions for everything, regardless of whether these are realistic, effective, or viable or if they fuel hatred, as the border wall issue clearly does.

Rejection of political correctness: Trump dares to say things that no one else would: racist statements, bawdy jokes, xenophobic and misogynistic comments. Many people, whether conservative or even liberal, erroneously perceive Trump as someone who says what they think and, far from paying attention to the content of his statements, they see this as freedom of expression triumph.

A hope for change: society in general sees Trump as someone who dares to challenge organizations that for decades have been all-powerful: Wall Street, the IMF, the government itself. They do not know for sure if he can really bring about change, but they are willing to give anyone a chance to represent something different from the status quo.

The power of the masses: when the wave of populism and political incorrectness begins to grow and gain strength, it means the masses are gaining strength. The vast majority of Trump’s followers are not interested in substantive policy proposals. They are being led by a social trend or fashion that at this point seems to be unstoppable.

Time to Stand Up to Populism

The outlook is uncertain: Trump still has a long way to go in his party and then against whoever becomes his Democratic rival (most likely Hillary Clinton).

However, Trump is giving future generations a lesson that we should already have learned in the history books: in politics, the best do not win. Those who know how to sweeten people’s ears come out on top.

Regardless of how absurd your proposals are and how much hatred you are promoting, the important thing is to win. And this is what Trump is doing.

As a free and independent Mexican, I think it’s time to act. I have no intention of allowing anyone to label me a criminal for the simple fact of being born where I was. I don’t intend to allow this kind of story to be repeated anymore.

What is happening in the United States should teach Mexicans a lesson about populism. Let us not forget that bravado, victimization, and populism served up for the masses are recurrent themes in our own political history.

It is time to start using and promoting values ​​like common sense, individual freedom, and cooperation as a means to spur economic growth. We have to promote equal opportunities by strengthening the rule of law and learning to respect others.

Only then will we avoid the triumph of absurd “Messiah” politicians who seek to victimize us all with their collective fantasies. Their fallacious, magic, and hate-promoting solutions have to be resisted. They do great harm to our environment and society.

Rafael Ruiz Velasco has a degree in Business Administration from the Mexico’s Anahuac University. He is firmly convinced that the only path for development and peace is one that dictates our individual freedom. His greatest passions have to do with Project Management, football, economics and reading (especially comics and graphic novels).

Original source

 

Anonymous Report: Was Arizona’s Voter Registration Data Hacked and Changed?

Ely Diaz made the trip from Los Angeles to Phoenix the last two weekends before the Arizona Democratic Primary to volunteer for Bernie Sanders. When Ely arrived to headquarters on Sunday morning, M…

Source: Anonymous Report: Was Arizona’s Voter Registration Data Hacked and Changed?

I’ve been neglecting this thing -again

Yea, it’s been a few days. Shit happens.

This story is great. Some unknown person has placed a Donald J Trump tombstone in Central Park.

CemDWCaWIAAwIf7

Direct c&p from the story on Freak Out Nation

A tombstone appeared in Central Park with Donald Trump’s name in capital letters, along with the words “Make American Hate Again.”

The headstone, which was spotted and photographed by multiple social media users Sunday afternoon and posted on the site Instagram.

The tombstone mysteriously appeared near Sheep’s Meadow overnight, but has reportedly been taken down, according to ABC 7.

The Daily News reports:

The stone, which was also inscribed with a large cross and flower-like designs, listed Trump’s birth year, 1946, but excluded a death year, leaving the bombastic billionaire’s demise open to interpretation….

Despite its apparent removal, park-goers appeared to enjoy the concept behind the slick headstone.

Trump isn’t very well liked in his home state, is he? We’re thinking this is another good reason for ‘gun free zones’ at venues which host the National Rifle Association’s conventions and the RNC’s. And at schools and colleges, too. It’s a shame Conservatives don’t see the hypocrisy though.

Last September as a crowd in New York City waited to catch a glimpse of the Pope, Trump appeared on the balcony of his Fifth Avenue headquarters’ balcony. As he waved, the crowd booed.  Trump went back inside. Upon returning to the balcony, the largely Hispanic crowd waiting to see the beloved Pope chanted “Feo! Feo!” —which in Spanish means “ugly.”

We’re wondering how the faux undertakers created, then erected the tombstone in Central Park without anyone noticing. Or perhaps, no one cared about the ‘Feo’ candidate’s demise:(

This is the strangest campaign season ever.

In  other news, #TrumpIsHitler is trending on Twitter.

Have a good week, anyone reading this.
-blu v1.0

 

John Ehrlichman

We’ve all seen it by now. I blogged it last night. There it was. Proof that the war on drugs was the sham that we’ve always known it to be. Finally. Here it is again, just to let it sink in a little deeper.

“The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

Thing is, this was said back in 1994. 22 years ago.

This has been public knowledge for twenty two years and it’s just now coming out all over social media like John Ehrlichman caught a big bad case of conscience and spilled this in a fit of remorse. No. No no no no. It’s been known for twenty two years that the war on drugs was just code for war on people of color and dissidents.

That’s 7 years of Bill Clinton, 8 years of George W Bush and going on 8 years of Barrack Obama.

Oh, it’s been good for business. Pay for prisons, urban renewal (a pet project of Mr Ehrlichman’s by the way) pee tests, fines, seizures, impoundments, probation, parole, court costs, “drug education”, pre-trial intervention… how long *is* this list? But they’ve profited from it. Guesstimated into the trillions. Since Nixon? That was 1968. How much money have they made off of this fake war on drugs since 1968?

 

 

Just Let This Sink In For A Minute

“The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.” Nixon aide and Watergate co-conspirator John Ehrlichman

Bernie Sanders Releases The Speech AIPAC Didn’t Want Him To Give

Copy and paste in entirety. Source at end.

Bernie Sanders was recently unable to speak about his plans for Middle Eastern policy at the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee because of a campaign engagement in Utah. Rather than taking the hit, though, Sanders decided to deliver that same speech in Salt Lake City. This decision seems to have worked in Sanders’ favor, as he won big in Utah last night with 79% of the Democratic vote.

According to Samantha Lachman of The Huffington Post, “Presidential candidates who come to AIPAC tend to emphasize their ‘unwavering commitment’ to Israel’s security, with some warm anecdotes thrown in about past visits to the country and how much they loved it.” Sanders, on the other hand, was not afraid to address current problems.

“We are obligated to speak the truth as we see it, and that is what real friendship demands, especially in difficult times. It is important among friends to be honest and truthful about differences we may have.”

He was also clear about his definition of peace meaning peace for everyone, and argued that, in order for that type of peace to be reached, some things will have to change.

‘Peace will require the unconditional recognition by all people of Israel’s right to exist. It will require an end to attacks of all kinds against Israel.

Peace will require that organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah renounce their efforts to undermine the security of Israel. It will require the entire world to recognize Israel.

Peace has to mean security for every Israeli from violence and terrorism.

But peace also means security for every Palestinian. It means achieving self-determination, civil rights, and economic well-being for the Palestinian people.

Peace will mean ending what amounts to the occupation of Palestinian territory, establishing mutually agreed upon borders, and pulling back settlements in the West Bank, just as Israel did in Gaza – once considered an unthinkable move on Israel’s part.’

He also acknowledged that he is aware of the difficulty involved in making his plan a reality when he said, “Let me just conclude by saying this: the issues that I’ve discussed today are not going to be easily solved.” However, he also noted the responsibility of the United States “as the most powerful nation on earth,” to bring people together and “try to put together coalitions in the region to destroy ISIS.” He finished his speech by letting people know he was up to the challenge.

‘And that is a responsibility that I, if elected president, would accept in a very, very serious way. We have seen too many wars, too much killing, too much suffering. And let us all together – people of good faith – do everything we can to finally, finally bring peace and stability to that region.’

Watch Sanders’ entire speech below, courtesy of Bernie 2016 via YouTube.

Source

3.5.16 Saturday is Meme Day

Keeping politics off of my Facebook page and restricting them to here has been an interesting experiment. I’m not sure if it’s going to be any type of success, really, but that’s what experiments are all about, right?

There are caucuses tonight in 5 states. I’m not going to stay up to see the results, though. They’ll be there tomorrow. Instead, here are my top picks for today’s memes. In no particular order. Enjoy.

10419424_1024691767578085_1165797582771908592_n

No explanation necessary.

12512446_1090876984312598_4958356770141564523_n

Oh very good!! VERY good.

12806181_1100111396708054_1502872487828918063_n

Again, to anyone who is talking Bernie or Bust. Come join the adults this political season. You’d honestly go from Bernie to Trump? Why? Because you haven’t gotten your way? Here’s a hint: Electing a fascist is not the smartest thing you could do.

Untitled

The better choice. #DumpTrump

Till tomorrow.. Peace.

-blu v1.0

P.S. A couple of video clips of Cruz being boo’d at CPAC. Why not, eh?

Watch Cruz get boo’d here